Skip to main content
Home
  • Home
  • Browse All Issues
  • Model Aviation.com

FF Sport and Scale

Author: Fernando Ramos


Edition: Model Aviation - 2002/09
Page Numbers: 135, 136, 137

THE OLD ADAGE "You can't teach an old dog new tricks" certainly applies to me. I have tried electric power on several fronts, and each time I have been thwarted for one reason or another. It seems as though I have this aura being around electrons that causes things to go bonkers. I have seen beautiful Free Flight (FF) Scale models—particularly multiengine — powered by electric that fly realistically. I see the advantage of not having to wipe off the model after each flight, just turning on a switch to get them to go, etc. However, I get weak in the knees when I have to pick up a battery pack and place it in a model. The batteries weigh more than the entire aircraft! I also admit that I don't particularly like the sound of the fan up front; give me a diesel or an ignition engine for that lovely noise and smell. One of my Wednesday flying buddies is flying an all-foam model (with a span of approximately 16 inches) that is powered with a very small Nickel Metal Hydride battery. He is consistently getting two-minute flights with it. I can see where a dime-scale model would be fun to fly with the small motor and battery. The simplicity of the setup appeals to me: a little motor, a little battery, a little propeller, and a little airplane —something you can almost fly in your back yard. That doesn't mean I can't be persuaded to add electric to my FF stable. I really haven't had the motivation. I still prefer CO2 over electric, and it does sound like a real airplane! Maybe someday, but not now. As I sit here thinking about electric. I finally figured why I have no interest. I get several model magazines each month, and I do mean several. In the sections that deal with electric (mostly Radio Control), it seems as though there are a zillion new motors each month, each with its own characteristics. Trying to cope with the battery requirements, voltage, and charging rates —forget it. I just put fuel in the tank, flip the propeller, and I'm off for another flight. I call that simple, and at my age simple is what I like. I have enough clutter in my brain, and I don't need anymore! One of my objectives in writing this column is to pass along hints that make your modeling easier and still create the illusion of a full-scale airplane. In all the years I spent in school. I spent only one semester in drafting —in junior high. What 1 know about drafting could be - Tissue Line Sheet Balsa on Each Rib CRACK RIB METHOD This is Barry Hetherington's rubber-powered Boeing. He is well known in the UK for his beautifully built, good-flying Jumbo Rubber models. Bill Dennis photo. Pete Smart's MP42 is powered with four KPOO electric motors. Pete builds outstanding models from foam, and they all fly. Bill Dennis photo. put into the proverbial thimble. So when it comes to drawing plans for a model to build from. I am not too well versed, especially when it comes to lofting stringers. (I am working on a full-scale 1935 WACO YMF-5. The fuselage has 32 stringers, and there are no plans for this task—only photos.) I had the hots to build a Heinkel He 64C, and with that lovely shaped fuselage I knew I was in trouble if I had to rely on my drafting prowess. I had a brainstorm that turned out better than I expected. I had a three-view the size I wanted to build this rubber-powered model. I transferred the profile view onto a piece of foam and cut it out with a band saw. This foam piece was a bit wider than half the width of the model. As in all, or most, three-views, there are cross-sections depicted along the length of the fuselage. I made copies of these sections and transferred them onto light cardboard. I carved half of a fuselage using the templates to keep the proper shape. This is similar to the way balsa solid models were done oh so long ago. I used different grits of sandpaper to get the proper shape. When I was satisfied with the final shape, I drew a datum line down the center of the fuselage from front to rear. On a sheet of paper a bit longer than the fuselage, I drew a line from one end to the other. Wherever I wanted a bulkhead. I drew a perpendicular line intersecting the horizontal line. I placed the foam fuselage half with its datum line setting directly on top of the horizontal line drawn on the paper. Wherever there was a perpendicular line, 1 drew it on the foam fuselage. Using a Zona® saw, I cut the fuselage where the vertical lines were. These became my cross-sections. Using graph paper folded in half, I traced each piece of foam cross-section onto the paper. With the paper still folded. I cut around the line. When the paper was opened, it left a perfect , template for each bulkhead. I decided that 1 wanted to lay my stringer on top of each bulkhead instead of notching them to place the stringers in. This meant that I had to undercut each template by '/i6 inch. This was easy enough to do. I could have made the fuselage half undersize by '/i6 inch, but the way I did it worked fine. I made my bulkheads by laminating two pieces of Vu x '/i<> basswood. I did this for strength and weight savings. I made a fixture to hold the bulkheads in their entirety, rather than using the half shell method. When completed, the fuselage looked good, and no lofting was required! I tried something different on the Heinkel's wings as well. This airplane has a double-tapered wing, requiring some fancy rib-making. I wasn't going to get out the ordinates for a particular airfoil and plot several different ribs. I drew the root rib and the tip rib, cut them from balsa, and placed them down on the spars. (The tip rib could be glued in place, but not the root rib until the rest of the wing was finished and the dihedral was cranked in.) Beside the spars, the leading and trailing edges were in place. Rectangular pieces of balsa were cut for each rib location with the spar notches then glued in place. You can probably see where I am going with this. After all the rectangles were glued in place along with the dihedral. I removed it from the building board after all parts were dry. With a long sanding block 1 sanded carefully from the root rib to the tip rib. When completed, I had a good-looking wing to go along with the fuselage. This may not be as simple as the cracked-wing method, but it certainly looks better. 1 have mentioned the cracked-wing method, which some of you may not be familiar with. It is one quick and simple way to make a wing. Since I dislike making wings, you would think I would use this method to build mine, but I have built only one wing this way. It is strange, but 1 never think of using this technique. From the illustration you can see how simple it is to lay out a wing. It doesn't matter if the wing is constant-chord or tapered. However, if the wing is tapered, the spar(s) must also be tapered. You have an option of using a single stick across the leading edge or filling in with sheet balsa to give a nice curve to the leading edge. Some use the single stick and add the sheet balsa to either side of it to give more rigidity and flow. Once the wing is covered, it looks good. Most people wouldn't notice the difference. I am not certain how a Scale judge would look at it, but it is an easy approach to building wings for Sport An electric-powered Peanut Scale Reister R Charlie Hendrickson. A kit is available from .III was designed by Tim Bucher and built by BMJR Model Products. BMJR photo. Scale. 1 will have to use this method more often. Vacuum-Forming: Enough has been written about this subject, and I doubt that I can add much more to the topic. However, I have a method that I have never seen written about that makes this task somewhat easier. Remember: I am into anything that will make model building easier without sacrificing Scale standards. This technique is a variation of plunging; that is, stuffing a mold into a piece of heated plastic that has been attached to a piece of plywood with the appropriate opening in it. Get a jar with the largest opening you can find. Cut a hole in the lid. leaving only roughly a '/t-inch flange around it. Cut a piece of acetate that will just fit inside the lid. Screw the lid onto the jar. The acetate should be nicely secured to the jar. Warm the jar slightly with a heat gun. then warm the acetate until it is soft. Plunge the mold into the acetate using two hands. If you try it with one hand, you won't make it; the resistance is unbelievable. You may find it easier if one person heats the acetate and another person is ready for the plunge. Sometimes by the time you put down the heat gun and pick up the mold, the acetate has cooled too much. The advantage to this method is that you don't have to make a new plywood cutout to accommodate, say, a different canopy. As long as the part you are making will fit within the size of the lid, you're in. That is the reason for using the largest wide-mouth jar you can find. I had a chance to review an aircraft from Easy Built Models: Roscoe Turner's Meteor. This is a 17%-inch-span Rubber model. The original plan was from 1939, but it has been updated. The quality of the wood is first-rate. as are the artwork, numerals, logos, etc. They are the cut, peel, and stick (as opposed to water-slide) decals. The Meteor also has a vacuum-formed canopy. This is not a beginner's model. Several areas would need explanation, and only experienced modelers would know how to deal with them. Where the wing attaches to the fuselage, the plan shows only three small places where glue could be applied; the rest would be on tissue only. Inserting a whole sheet of balsa where the wing is attached would be a simple remedy. Another issue is that it appears that the vertical stabilizer should be built flat, but that is not the case. The bottom has to be as thick as the fuselage for proper fairing. The plans show a right and left wing and another right wing panel with no explanation for the additional panel. Otherwise, this is a fine-flying airplane that can be built with minimum effort. Easy Built has more than 50 models to offer. One that I have built several of is the Miss Canada. It is a 36-inch commercial Rubber model that flies unbelievably well, and it is easy to build. Another product from Easy Built is its Lite tissue. It is available in 26 colors, including two metallics. The colors are permanent, so covering wet is no problem. Each sheet is 20 x 30 inches and weighs 6.45 grams. The price is reasonable, at $0.45 cents a sheet, with metallics at $1 per sheet. A color catalog costs $3 or is free with an order. Contact Easy Built Models at 1851 Dutch Rd., Fairview PA 16415-1957; Tel.: (814) 474-9110. m

Author: Fernando Ramos


Edition: Model Aviation - 2002/09
Page Numbers: 135, 136, 137

THE OLD ADAGE "You can't teach an old dog new tricks" certainly applies to me. I have tried electric power on several fronts, and each time I have been thwarted for one reason or another. It seems as though I have this aura being around electrons that causes things to go bonkers. I have seen beautiful Free Flight (FF) Scale models—particularly multiengine — powered by electric that fly realistically. I see the advantage of not having to wipe off the model after each flight, just turning on a switch to get them to go, etc. However, I get weak in the knees when I have to pick up a battery pack and place it in a model. The batteries weigh more than the entire aircraft! I also admit that I don't particularly like the sound of the fan up front; give me a diesel or an ignition engine for that lovely noise and smell. One of my Wednesday flying buddies is flying an all-foam model (with a span of approximately 16 inches) that is powered with a very small Nickel Metal Hydride battery. He is consistently getting two-minute flights with it. I can see where a dime-scale model would be fun to fly with the small motor and battery. The simplicity of the setup appeals to me: a little motor, a little battery, a little propeller, and a little airplane —something you can almost fly in your back yard. That doesn't mean I can't be persuaded to add electric to my FF stable. I really haven't had the motivation. I still prefer CO2 over electric, and it does sound like a real airplane! Maybe someday, but not now. As I sit here thinking about electric. I finally figured why I have no interest. I get several model magazines each month, and I do mean several. In the sections that deal with electric (mostly Radio Control), it seems as though there are a zillion new motors each month, each with its own characteristics. Trying to cope with the battery requirements, voltage, and charging rates —forget it. I just put fuel in the tank, flip the propeller, and I'm off for another flight. I call that simple, and at my age simple is what I like. I have enough clutter in my brain, and I don't need anymore! One of my objectives in writing this column is to pass along hints that make your modeling easier and still create the illusion of a full-scale airplane. In all the years I spent in school. I spent only one semester in drafting —in junior high. What 1 know about drafting could be - Tissue Line Sheet Balsa on Each Rib CRACK RIB METHOD This is Barry Hetherington's rubber-powered Boeing. He is well known in the UK for his beautifully built, good-flying Jumbo Rubber models. Bill Dennis photo. Pete Smart's MP42 is powered with four KPOO electric motors. Pete builds outstanding models from foam, and they all fly. Bill Dennis photo. put into the proverbial thimble. So when it comes to drawing plans for a model to build from. I am not too well versed, especially when it comes to lofting stringers. (I am working on a full-scale 1935 WACO YMF-5. The fuselage has 32 stringers, and there are no plans for this task—only photos.) I had the hots to build a Heinkel He 64C, and with that lovely shaped fuselage I knew I was in trouble if I had to rely on my drafting prowess. I had a brainstorm that turned out better than I expected. I had a three-view the size I wanted to build this rubber-powered model. I transferred the profile view onto a piece of foam and cut it out with a band saw. This foam piece was a bit wider than half the width of the model. As in all, or most, three-views, there are cross-sections depicted along the length of the fuselage. I made copies of these sections and transferred them onto light cardboard. I carved half of a fuselage using the templates to keep the proper shape. This is similar to the way balsa solid models were done oh so long ago. I used different grits of sandpaper to get the proper shape. When I was satisfied with the final shape, I drew a datum line down the center of the fuselage from front to rear. On a sheet of paper a bit longer than the fuselage, I drew a line from one end to the other. Wherever I wanted a bulkhead. I drew a perpendicular line intersecting the horizontal line. I placed the foam fuselage half with its datum line setting directly on top of the horizontal line drawn on the paper. Wherever there was a perpendicular line, 1 drew it on the foam fuselage. Using a Zona® saw, I cut the fuselage where the vertical lines were. These became my cross-sections. Using graph paper folded in half, I traced each piece of foam cross-section onto the paper. With the paper still folded. I cut around the line. When the paper was opened, it left a perfect , template for each bulkhead. I decided that 1 wanted to lay my stringer on top of each bulkhead instead of notching them to place the stringers in. This meant that I had to undercut each template by '/i6 inch. This was easy enough to do. I could have made the fuselage half undersize by '/i6 inch, but the way I did it worked fine. I made my bulkheads by laminating two pieces of Vu x '/i<> basswood. I did this for strength and weight savings. I made a fixture to hold the bulkheads in their entirety, rather than using the half shell method. When completed, the fuselage looked good, and no lofting was required! I tried something different on the Heinkel's wings as well. This airplane has a double-tapered wing, requiring some fancy rib-making. I wasn't going to get out the ordinates for a particular airfoil and plot several different ribs. I drew the root rib and the tip rib, cut them from balsa, and placed them down on the spars. (The tip rib could be glued in place, but not the root rib until the rest of the wing was finished and the dihedral was cranked in.) Beside the spars, the leading and trailing edges were in place. Rectangular pieces of balsa were cut for each rib location with the spar notches then glued in place. You can probably see where I am going with this. After all the rectangles were glued in place along with the dihedral. I removed it from the building board after all parts were dry. With a long sanding block 1 sanded carefully from the root rib to the tip rib. When completed, I had a good-looking wing to go along with the fuselage. This may not be as simple as the cracked-wing method, but it certainly looks better. 1 have mentioned the cracked-wing method, which some of you may not be familiar with. It is one quick and simple way to make a wing. Since I dislike making wings, you would think I would use this method to build mine, but I have built only one wing this way. It is strange, but 1 never think of using this technique. From the illustration you can see how simple it is to lay out a wing. It doesn't matter if the wing is constant-chord or tapered. However, if the wing is tapered, the spar(s) must also be tapered. You have an option of using a single stick across the leading edge or filling in with sheet balsa to give a nice curve to the leading edge. Some use the single stick and add the sheet balsa to either side of it to give more rigidity and flow. Once the wing is covered, it looks good. Most people wouldn't notice the difference. I am not certain how a Scale judge would look at it, but it is an easy approach to building wings for Sport An electric-powered Peanut Scale Reister R Charlie Hendrickson. A kit is available from .III was designed by Tim Bucher and built by BMJR Model Products. BMJR photo. Scale. 1 will have to use this method more often. Vacuum-Forming: Enough has been written about this subject, and I doubt that I can add much more to the topic. However, I have a method that I have never seen written about that makes this task somewhat easier. Remember: I am into anything that will make model building easier without sacrificing Scale standards. This technique is a variation of plunging; that is, stuffing a mold into a piece of heated plastic that has been attached to a piece of plywood with the appropriate opening in it. Get a jar with the largest opening you can find. Cut a hole in the lid. leaving only roughly a '/t-inch flange around it. Cut a piece of acetate that will just fit inside the lid. Screw the lid onto the jar. The acetate should be nicely secured to the jar. Warm the jar slightly with a heat gun. then warm the acetate until it is soft. Plunge the mold into the acetate using two hands. If you try it with one hand, you won't make it; the resistance is unbelievable. You may find it easier if one person heats the acetate and another person is ready for the plunge. Sometimes by the time you put down the heat gun and pick up the mold, the acetate has cooled too much. The advantage to this method is that you don't have to make a new plywood cutout to accommodate, say, a different canopy. As long as the part you are making will fit within the size of the lid, you're in. That is the reason for using the largest wide-mouth jar you can find. I had a chance to review an aircraft from Easy Built Models: Roscoe Turner's Meteor. This is a 17%-inch-span Rubber model. The original plan was from 1939, but it has been updated. The quality of the wood is first-rate. as are the artwork, numerals, logos, etc. They are the cut, peel, and stick (as opposed to water-slide) decals. The Meteor also has a vacuum-formed canopy. This is not a beginner's model. Several areas would need explanation, and only experienced modelers would know how to deal with them. Where the wing attaches to the fuselage, the plan shows only three small places where glue could be applied; the rest would be on tissue only. Inserting a whole sheet of balsa where the wing is attached would be a simple remedy. Another issue is that it appears that the vertical stabilizer should be built flat, but that is not the case. The bottom has to be as thick as the fuselage for proper fairing. The plans show a right and left wing and another right wing panel with no explanation for the additional panel. Otherwise, this is a fine-flying airplane that can be built with minimum effort. Easy Built has more than 50 models to offer. One that I have built several of is the Miss Canada. It is a 36-inch commercial Rubber model that flies unbelievably well, and it is easy to build. Another product from Easy Built is its Lite tissue. It is available in 26 colors, including two metallics. The colors are permanent, so covering wet is no problem. Each sheet is 20 x 30 inches and weighs 6.45 grams. The price is reasonable, at $0.45 cents a sheet, with metallics at $1 per sheet. A color catalog costs $3 or is free with an order. Contact Easy Built Models at 1851 Dutch Rd., Fairview PA 16415-1957; Tel.: (814) 474-9110. m

Author: Fernando Ramos


Edition: Model Aviation - 2002/09
Page Numbers: 135, 136, 137

THE OLD ADAGE "You can't teach an old dog new tricks" certainly applies to me. I have tried electric power on several fronts, and each time I have been thwarted for one reason or another. It seems as though I have this aura being around electrons that causes things to go bonkers. I have seen beautiful Free Flight (FF) Scale models—particularly multiengine — powered by electric that fly realistically. I see the advantage of not having to wipe off the model after each flight, just turning on a switch to get them to go, etc. However, I get weak in the knees when I have to pick up a battery pack and place it in a model. The batteries weigh more than the entire aircraft! I also admit that I don't particularly like the sound of the fan up front; give me a diesel or an ignition engine for that lovely noise and smell. One of my Wednesday flying buddies is flying an all-foam model (with a span of approximately 16 inches) that is powered with a very small Nickel Metal Hydride battery. He is consistently getting two-minute flights with it. I can see where a dime-scale model would be fun to fly with the small motor and battery. The simplicity of the setup appeals to me: a little motor, a little battery, a little propeller, and a little airplane —something you can almost fly in your back yard. That doesn't mean I can't be persuaded to add electric to my FF stable. I really haven't had the motivation. I still prefer CO2 over electric, and it does sound like a real airplane! Maybe someday, but not now. As I sit here thinking about electric. I finally figured why I have no interest. I get several model magazines each month, and I do mean several. In the sections that deal with electric (mostly Radio Control), it seems as though there are a zillion new motors each month, each with its own characteristics. Trying to cope with the battery requirements, voltage, and charging rates —forget it. I just put fuel in the tank, flip the propeller, and I'm off for another flight. I call that simple, and at my age simple is what I like. I have enough clutter in my brain, and I don't need anymore! One of my objectives in writing this column is to pass along hints that make your modeling easier and still create the illusion of a full-scale airplane. In all the years I spent in school. I spent only one semester in drafting —in junior high. What 1 know about drafting could be - Tissue Line Sheet Balsa on Each Rib CRACK RIB METHOD This is Barry Hetherington's rubber-powered Boeing. He is well known in the UK for his beautifully built, good-flying Jumbo Rubber models. Bill Dennis photo. Pete Smart's MP42 is powered with four KPOO electric motors. Pete builds outstanding models from foam, and they all fly. Bill Dennis photo. put into the proverbial thimble. So when it comes to drawing plans for a model to build from. I am not too well versed, especially when it comes to lofting stringers. (I am working on a full-scale 1935 WACO YMF-5. The fuselage has 32 stringers, and there are no plans for this task—only photos.) I had the hots to build a Heinkel He 64C, and with that lovely shaped fuselage I knew I was in trouble if I had to rely on my drafting prowess. I had a brainstorm that turned out better than I expected. I had a three-view the size I wanted to build this rubber-powered model. I transferred the profile view onto a piece of foam and cut it out with a band saw. This foam piece was a bit wider than half the width of the model. As in all, or most, three-views, there are cross-sections depicted along the length of the fuselage. I made copies of these sections and transferred them onto light cardboard. I carved half of a fuselage using the templates to keep the proper shape. This is similar to the way balsa solid models were done oh so long ago. I used different grits of sandpaper to get the proper shape. When I was satisfied with the final shape, I drew a datum line down the center of the fuselage from front to rear. On a sheet of paper a bit longer than the fuselage, I drew a line from one end to the other. Wherever I wanted a bulkhead. I drew a perpendicular line intersecting the horizontal line. I placed the foam fuselage half with its datum line setting directly on top of the horizontal line drawn on the paper. Wherever there was a perpendicular line, 1 drew it on the foam fuselage. Using a Zona® saw, I cut the fuselage where the vertical lines were. These became my cross-sections. Using graph paper folded in half, I traced each piece of foam cross-section onto the paper. With the paper still folded. I cut around the line. When the paper was opened, it left a perfect , template for each bulkhead. I decided that 1 wanted to lay my stringer on top of each bulkhead instead of notching them to place the stringers in. This meant that I had to undercut each template by '/i6 inch. This was easy enough to do. I could have made the fuselage half undersize by '/i6 inch, but the way I did it worked fine. I made my bulkheads by laminating two pieces of Vu x '/i<> basswood. I did this for strength and weight savings. I made a fixture to hold the bulkheads in their entirety, rather than using the half shell method. When completed, the fuselage looked good, and no lofting was required! I tried something different on the Heinkel's wings as well. This airplane has a double-tapered wing, requiring some fancy rib-making. I wasn't going to get out the ordinates for a particular airfoil and plot several different ribs. I drew the root rib and the tip rib, cut them from balsa, and placed them down on the spars. (The tip rib could be glued in place, but not the root rib until the rest of the wing was finished and the dihedral was cranked in.) Beside the spars, the leading and trailing edges were in place. Rectangular pieces of balsa were cut for each rib location with the spar notches then glued in place. You can probably see where I am going with this. After all the rectangles were glued in place along with the dihedral. I removed it from the building board after all parts were dry. With a long sanding block 1 sanded carefully from the root rib to the tip rib. When completed, I had a good-looking wing to go along with the fuselage. This may not be as simple as the cracked-wing method, but it certainly looks better. 1 have mentioned the cracked-wing method, which some of you may not be familiar with. It is one quick and simple way to make a wing. Since I dislike making wings, you would think I would use this method to build mine, but I have built only one wing this way. It is strange, but 1 never think of using this technique. From the illustration you can see how simple it is to lay out a wing. It doesn't matter if the wing is constant-chord or tapered. However, if the wing is tapered, the spar(s) must also be tapered. You have an option of using a single stick across the leading edge or filling in with sheet balsa to give a nice curve to the leading edge. Some use the single stick and add the sheet balsa to either side of it to give more rigidity and flow. Once the wing is covered, it looks good. Most people wouldn't notice the difference. I am not certain how a Scale judge would look at it, but it is an easy approach to building wings for Sport An electric-powered Peanut Scale Reister R Charlie Hendrickson. A kit is available from .III was designed by Tim Bucher and built by BMJR Model Products. BMJR photo. Scale. 1 will have to use this method more often. Vacuum-Forming: Enough has been written about this subject, and I doubt that I can add much more to the topic. However, I have a method that I have never seen written about that makes this task somewhat easier. Remember: I am into anything that will make model building easier without sacrificing Scale standards. This technique is a variation of plunging; that is, stuffing a mold into a piece of heated plastic that has been attached to a piece of plywood with the appropriate opening in it. Get a jar with the largest opening you can find. Cut a hole in the lid. leaving only roughly a '/t-inch flange around it. Cut a piece of acetate that will just fit inside the lid. Screw the lid onto the jar. The acetate should be nicely secured to the jar. Warm the jar slightly with a heat gun. then warm the acetate until it is soft. Plunge the mold into the acetate using two hands. If you try it with one hand, you won't make it; the resistance is unbelievable. You may find it easier if one person heats the acetate and another person is ready for the plunge. Sometimes by the time you put down the heat gun and pick up the mold, the acetate has cooled too much. The advantage to this method is that you don't have to make a new plywood cutout to accommodate, say, a different canopy. As long as the part you are making will fit within the size of the lid, you're in. That is the reason for using the largest wide-mouth jar you can find. I had a chance to review an aircraft from Easy Built Models: Roscoe Turner's Meteor. This is a 17%-inch-span Rubber model. The original plan was from 1939, but it has been updated. The quality of the wood is first-rate. as are the artwork, numerals, logos, etc. They are the cut, peel, and stick (as opposed to water-slide) decals. The Meteor also has a vacuum-formed canopy. This is not a beginner's model. Several areas would need explanation, and only experienced modelers would know how to deal with them. Where the wing attaches to the fuselage, the plan shows only three small places where glue could be applied; the rest would be on tissue only. Inserting a whole sheet of balsa where the wing is attached would be a simple remedy. Another issue is that it appears that the vertical stabilizer should be built flat, but that is not the case. The bottom has to be as thick as the fuselage for proper fairing. The plans show a right and left wing and another right wing panel with no explanation for the additional panel. Otherwise, this is a fine-flying airplane that can be built with minimum effort. Easy Built has more than 50 models to offer. One that I have built several of is the Miss Canada. It is a 36-inch commercial Rubber model that flies unbelievably well, and it is easy to build. Another product from Easy Built is its Lite tissue. It is available in 26 colors, including two metallics. The colors are permanent, so covering wet is no problem. Each sheet is 20 x 30 inches and weighs 6.45 grams. The price is reasonable, at $0.45 cents a sheet, with metallics at $1 per sheet. A color catalog costs $3 or is free with an order. Contact Easy Built Models at 1851 Dutch Rd., Fairview PA 16415-1957; Tel.: (814) 474-9110. m

ama call to action logo
Join Now

Model Aviation Live
Watch Now

Privacy policy   |   Terms of use

Model Aviation is a monthly publication for the Academy of Model Aeronautics.
© 1936-2025 Academy of Model Aeronautics. All rights reserved. 5161 E. Memorial Dr. Muncie IN 47302.   Tel: (800) 435-9262; Fax: (765) 289-4248

Park Pilot LogoAMA Logo