Control Line: Aerobatics
EACH NATS SEEMS to develop its own feeling or character, which, over the years, has been neon models, big models, semiscales, pipes, etc. As I recalled the Lubbock Nationals, the thought struck me that the Precision Aerobatics community has seen significant, worthwhile change. We have evolved from the early Nats, where our entire competitive year was wrapped up in one flight, to an elimination process, where the national champion proves himself or herself. Over the years, we have gradually added other events that developed participation, such as Old-Time, Classic, and the Advanced skill class. We now have a real flying format Monday through Saturday. But the more things change, the more they remain the same: the character and strength of our event are the people, and it will always be so. As many already know, we have the pleasure of renewing longtime friendships year after year.
Control Line: Aerobatics
DEDICATING A COLUMN to beginning Precision Aerobatics stirred memories of how I got involved many years ago. In the late 1940s, even the sound of a engine running was exciting to me. I remember a brave soul starting an ignition engine in New York's Central Park in the middle of winter. My dad and I watched him for more than an hour, but he didn't have much success. Then we learned about Pelham Bay Park, which was set up for Control Line model flying. We could reach the park by an hour subway ride and a thirty-minute walk, so up we went the following Saturday. Several modelers working hard at flying were having varying degrees of success. One flier I remember in particular was an older gentleman called Whitey. I never knew his real name, but he was the person who probably got me interested. He was a good craftsman (I believe he was a cabinet maker).
Control Line: Aerobatics
DURING THE LAST few years, I've mentioned the "History of Stunt" that Wynn Paul is developing with the help of many of our community. The scale is massive, and every contest is an opportunity for more photos to be donated, planes identified, and autographs rendered. Wynn's latest letter on the project status is full of contributors, along with a list of areas where more photos and information are needed. Wynn is still looking for scoreboard shots of the '48, '50, '51, '61, '62, and '65 Nationals and the 1965 FAI tryouts at Dayton, Ohio. He's also looking for pictures of Robert Dailey, Don Ferguson, Lou Andrews, Harold de Bolt, Robert Tucker ('47 winner) and Davis (Davey) Slagle. Photos of the Nationals, FAI, and World Championship from all years are always welcome.
Control Line: Aerobatics
I'VE JUST TAKEN a Warren truss/geodetic built-up wing off the cradle, and I'm really impressed with the construction method. In the technology series, I mentioned a wing construction technique invented by Bob Hunt called the Lost Foam Method. It involved creating a construction set by first using the root and tip templates of a chosen wing type (for example, Impact or Saturn) to cut a normal core set. This is the point where the technology extends. Instead of using the core as the basis of the wing to be sheeted, the core is marked with the desired rib locations and cut at those locations. These sections are then used to make rib templates. Now we shift focus a bit and look at the saddles, which in this application become the center point as the construction jig, plans, etc. The bottom cradles have the wing construction marked on them so that the wing is assembled in the cradles, pinned in place, and adhered with cyanoacrylate (CyA) glue.
Control Line Aerobatics
TO RUN A SETUP (ST .60, .46 piped engine etc.) to its potential, a flier really needs to find the potential problems, experience them, and develop procedures to minimize or eliminate them. For instance, there has been a lot of press about the benefits of tuned-pipe combinations. When correctly set up and maintained, the various combinations (O.S., OPS, Randy Smith Completion Aero) work extremely well. I really like the combination that I use (OPS .40 Spa with Smith/Werwage pipes), but it has taken a lot of work. The reality of engine combinations is that they all take work to understand how to make them perform under extreme conditions. You simply haven't "pushed the envelope" if you say that everything has worked with the same setting from the get-go.

