Radio Control: Aerobatics
We visited the question of building models versus buying same awhile back, and examined the philosophical angles, the moral dilemma, the practical side, the cost/benefit ratio, etc. Still, however we acquire a model, there is one thing almost all of us must do: Buy it or build it, we still have to put our equipment in it, and set it up properly Equipment installation and setup is the second-most-critical building step in determining how well a finished model performs, after fuselage/surface alignment and trammeling. Every servo hookup made; every cable run rigged; every control horn, mount or support/retainer installed, is flight-critical. All of it should be as perfect as you can make it, because even a little mistake or miscalculation in this area can kill your pride-and-joy. Even small, nonfatal miscues, which are much more common, may have an effect entirely out-of-proportion to their perceived size. Every spring, I'm called on to help trim unruly models at the local practice field. I often find that tiny setup errors are the only difference between an "off the board" keeper and an unfairly-labeled "dog." When these "minor" items are pointed out to the owner as the source of the difficulty, the usual reaction is disbelief that something so insignificant could cause so much grief.
The "Quiet Man" Makes It to the Top
The 13th International Tournament of Champions was won by a quiet man from Baltimore: Steve Stricker. Steve did it by consistently outflying the competition through both Known and Unknown programs. He won three of six rounds in the wind-shortened preliminaries and three of six in the finals to score a convincing victory over most of the best RC aerobatic pilots in the world. A longtime TOC participant and perennial bridesmaid, Steve finished 14th in '82, second in '84, sixth in '88, fourth in '90, second in '92, and second in '94.
Radio Control: Aerobatics
During every AMA rules cycle, the National Society of Radio Controlled Aerobatics (NSRCA) surveys its members to determine what pattern event rules may need to be modified, added to, or subtracted from the AMA Competition Regulations. The survey results carry no force of law; they are advisory in nature, and intended solely to guide the NSRCA Rules Committee as it generates the NSRCA-backed rules proposals, and lobbies for or against proposals affecting Pattern that are received from other sources. Although the survey results are only advisory, they carry significant weight with the RC Aerobatics Contest Board. The Rules Survey is one of the best reasons for becoming a member of NSRCA-second only to the excellent monthly newsletter, K-Factor, which is really a 40-page miniature magazine devoted entirely to Precision Aerobatics.
Radio Control: Aerobatics
Seldom have new modeling products been more anxiously awaited than the new generation of Pattern engines now appearing under hobby shop counters across the country. The development of engines such as the Webra-based UAV Bully 1.20 two-stroke, the O.S. 1.40 two-stroke, and the Y.S. 1.40FZ was inevitable as soon as the lifting of the old engine displacement limits in FAI F3A (1995) and AMA Pattern (1996) became law. I've yet to run either of the new two-strokes, but when Steve Helms of Futaba offered me a chance to "try out" a new Y.S. 1.40FZ in advance of its introduction, I was easily persuaded. After all, I have a duty to alert the readers of this column to possible nifty goodies on the horizon. Yes.
Radio Control: Aerobatics
A CHANGE of near-global proportions has recently rolled over the RC Aerobatics events, and so far, very few competitors have noticed. This quiet tsunami actually washed over more than just Pattern and Sport Aerobatics; every other event in the Competition Regulations was equally impacted, and I don't believe many participants in those events have noticed yet, either. I'm referring to the new three-year AMA rules cycle, which replaced the old two-year cycle early last year. A brief explanation of the change and a new timeline was properly published in "Focus on Competition," but judging from the mail (both E-mail and the "snail" variety), many of you fail to read that section of the magazine thoroughly.

